Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPřichystalová, Radka
dc.contributor.authorCaron-Beaudoin, E.
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, L.
dc.contributor.authorDirkx, E.
dc.contributor.authorAmadou, A.
dc.contributor.authorZávodná, T.
dc.contributor.authorČihák, R.
dc.contributor.authorCogliano, V.
dc.contributor.authorHynes, J.
dc.contributor.authorPelland-St-Pierre, L.
dc.contributor.authorVerner, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorvan Tongeren, M.
dc.contributor.authorHo, V.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T08:41:16Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T08:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. 2020.cs
dc.identifier.issn1559-0631
dc.identifier.issn1559-064X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10084/142244
dc.description.abstractEndocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous substances that interfere with the endocrine system and cause adverse effects. We aimed to classify the effects of 24 known EDCs, prevalent in certain occupations, according to four modes of action (estrogenic, antiestrogenic, androgenic, and/or antiandrogenic). A literature search, stratified into four types of literature was conducted (namely: national and international agency reports; review articles; primary studies; ToxCast(TM)). The state of the evidence of each EDC on sex hormone function was summarized and reviewed by an expert panel. For each mode of action, the experts evaluated the likelihood of endocrine disruption in five categories: "No", "Unlikely", "Possibly", "Probably", and "Yes". Seven agents were categorized as "Yes," or having strong evidence for their effects on sex hormone function (antiandrogenic: lead, arsenic, butylbenzyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, dicyclohexyl phthalate; estrogenic: nonylphenol, bisphenol A). Nine agents were categorized as "Probable," or having probable evidence (antiandrogenic: bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, nonylphenol, toluene, bisphenol A, diisononyl phthalate; androgenic: cadmium; estrogenic: copper, cadmium and; anti-estrogenic: lead). Two agents (arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls) had opposing conclusions supporting both "probably" estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects. This synthesis will allow researchers to evaluate the health effects of selected EDCs with an added level of precision related to the mode of action.cs
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherSpringer Naturecs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiologycs
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0253-zcs
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020, Springer Naturecs
dc.subjectendocrine disruptorcs
dc.subjectestrogeniccs
dc.subjectantiestrogeniccs
dc.subjectandrogeniccs
dc.subjectantiandrogeniccs
dc.subjectoccupational exposurescs
dc.titleAn approach to classifying occupational exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals by sex hormone function using an expert judgment processcs
dc.typearticlecs
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41370-020-0253-z
dc.type.statusPeer-reviewedcs
dc.description.sourceWeb of Sciencecs
dc.identifier.wos000551804500001


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record